Another Reflection for this Lent

It is customary during Septuagesima-tide to prepare ourselves for Lent, deciding which spiritual disciplines we are going to be more serious about, which sins and vices we are going to work against, what things which are neutral or good in themselves we are going to renounce, which good works we are going to do. This Lenten discipline began in the early Church with the preparation of the catechumens for Baptism during the Paschal Vigil of Holy Saturday. We prepare ourselves to relive our Baptism through the liturgy and the renewal of our commitment.

Yesterday’s liturgy linked everything in my own mind, from my mother’s transitus to our own mortality and weakness. Lent is the time to reflect on our own mortality and the point at which wisdom begins – the fear of the Lord. In this context, fear would not be the emotion caused by danger, but our utmost respect of God as our love for our parents. After this, Lent is about illumination, having our blindness and ignorance healed so that we might find wisdom and knowledge.

One aspect of ignorance I particularly deplore is the hubbub going on around the abdication of the Pope. (By the way, see this lovely and uplifting article by Fr George Rutler). There are two centres of speculation – why he decided to abdicate other than the reasons of health he gave, and who will get to be the next Pope. Yesterday was the last public liturgy celebrated by this Pope, during which he put over some capital ideas, implying his unwillingness to be anything other than a man of total integrity and righteousness, or to collaborate in the intrigue and hypocrisy that have engulfed the Roman bureaucracy and many of the dioceses in the world.

Some very credible men of the Church have denounced not just weakness or sin in the institutional structures of the Church, but evil. How this evil manifests itself is nebulous and intangible. As the New Testament would say, its name is Legion.  Exorcism is also a major theme of Lent as evidenced in the exorcisms during the traditional rite of baptism and the Gospel narratives of Christ chasing demons from the possessed.

The Vatican has been involved in geopolitics for centuries. When I was a student in the 1980’s, I found Malachi Martin’s novel Vatican in a bookshop and I have read it several times. Whatever one might say about this Irish Jesuit priest who left his community in the 1960’s but who did not marry or seek official laicisation, his massive parable of the Church since 1945 to the death of John Paul II (which hadn’t occurred when this book was written) is haunting. The story follows a young fictitious American prelate who works for the Vatican over the years from his arrival in 1945 and is finally elected Pope after the death of John Paul II. Intertwined with historical fact, we find fictional characters like the Della Valle dynasty of so-called Keepers of the Bond and the secret observation chamber at the Sistine Chapel called Il Tempio. The Bargain, in this book, is the agreement dating from 1870 between the Church and the Lodge. I would recommend reading this book, provided that you do so with a critical and detached mind. Fr Malachi Martin, who died in 1999, was an enigmatic character and was himself an exorcist. He wrote a very harrowing book under the title Hostage to the Devil. However, I would leave a word of caution: Fr Malachi Martin was an Irishman, and those people like a scrap and would talk the hind leg off a donkey!

Individual persons can suffer from diabolical possession and obsession, and sometimes the dividing line is very fine between mental illness that comes under natural science and this terrifying mystery of evil. Institutions too can be consumed by evil. A fictional example is the monastery in northern Italy in 1327 that features in Umberto Eco’s The Name of the Rose. The rot is so much a part of the fabric of that monastery with its secret library that the only outcome was its total destruction. Was that novel a parable of something greater than a single monastic community? I am not saying that the Church is evil, but there are evil men and corrupt institutions. It happened to Judaism after the Second Exile and up to the final Diaspora after the Sack of Rome in AD 70.

And Jesus answering said unto him, Seest thou these great buildings? there shall not be left one stone upon another, that shall not be thrown down.

As I mentioned Umberto Eco and his best known work, I also quote:

The Antichrist can be born from piety itself, from excessive love of God or of the truth, as the heretic is born from the saint and the possessed from the seer. Fear prophets, Adso, and those prepared to die for the truth, for as a rule they make many others die with them, often before them, at times instead of them.

How true, “conspiracy theory” psychology is also a terrifying phenomenon and works like an addition to chemical substances or various types of pleasure. Indeed, evil can come from excessive desire of good and truth. We have to be careful not to fall into those very traps.

I am not a prophet and cannot claim to know the future in any way, but I can’t avoid thinking it will probably be bleak here in Europe.

Let the priests and Levites, ministers of the Lord, weep between the porch and the altar, saying. Spare thy people, O Lord, spare them, and turn not away the faces of them that call upon thee, O Lord.

One thing is sure: this diabolical mess feeds from our ignorance, prejudice and speculation.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to Another Reflection for this Lent

  1. Dale says:

    it is interesting to note that you mention Fr Malachy Martin. Have you read his “Decline and Fall of the Roman Church”? I found it to be an excellent exposition of many of the same points that you have recently posited about Rome (And has very much influenced my own thinking). Fr Martin is interesting in that he never renounced his orders and continued to celebrate only the traditional Mass, whilst openly pointing out defects in the modern Roman (both post Trent and Vatican I) system. What is strange is how disliked he is by both modernist as well as traditionalist Catholics.

  2. Fr. Martin was a complex figure, and by certain accounts, his departure from the Jesuits had as much to do with his interest in women as with anything else. However, “Hostage to the Devil” is must reading for any priest, and “Keys of this Blood” is a compelling account of both the history of Poland and the early pontificate of John Paul II written from a perspective that can only be that of an insider.

    In terms of his fiction, “Vatican” is fairly straightforward, although one is certainly aware that much of it is clearly non-fiction. “Windswept House” is far more complex, with historical American Churchmen easily identifiable underneath his thin disguises; one hopes that this last piece of his is more the product of a mind already succumbing to dementia far more than a largely true account, clothed in the devices of fiction. Much of it is simply horrifying.

    Finally, I must also mention “Rich Church Poor Church” and “King of Kings”. The latter, a novel about King David, is early Martin at his best. In the former, he takes up many of the themes found on this blog in terms of the relationship of the Church to the world.

    May he rest in peace and may his memory be eternal.

    • Dale says:

      Gregory stated: “by certain accounts, his departure from the Jesuits had as much to do with his interest in women as with anything else.”

      Please let us be careful in simply positing gossip. Until recently, perhaps even today? whenever anyone left a religious order the “by certain accounts” always blamed it on an “interest in women.” Unless there is absolute proof for this, it is best not to repeat such insinuations. They are often false, and always in bad taste.

      • MP says:

        Thank you, Father Dale. The “women” allegation chiefly referred to Father Martin’s relationship with his landlady who ran the boarding house where he resided after he parted from the Jesuits. It was an unfounded allegation, and can be deemed to be a smear by his enemies.

  3. Sorry, gentlemen, but I have this from reliable sources who knew Fr. Martin personally. Do I hold it against him? Not particularly. Why should I?

  4. ed pacht says:

    even factual statements can become malicious gossip when they are not really relevant to the matter at hand. We are all flawed — does that mean that what we do right is to be disregarded? Can we not just listen to what someone says without having to weigh it against his every peccadillo. I prefer not to know such things unless they are fully relevant, and would be very hesitant to repeat them even if I thought they were. Too many times have I seen reputations damaged and good works undone in such a manner.

  5. William Tighe says:

    I met Malachi Martin in 1978; he invited me to lunch at his penthouse apartment on Park Avenue in New york City, and we corresponded for a year or two subsequently. He claimed that he had “secret permission” from Cardinal Cook to celebrate, exclusively and privately, the Tridentine Mass. I did not know what to make of him then, and I do not know now.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s