Morning After Round-up

I’m still reeling even though I went nowhere when most of the TAC either crumbled or went by bits and pieces into the Ordinariates. What transpired is that anyone who has an interest in liturgy, Anglican or pre-Pauline Roman, is at the bottom of the list of priorities. As far as the liturgy, traditionalists and Anglicans are concerned, the clock has been turned back twenty years, or more, or less.

From what I have been reading in Sandro Magister (The First Pope Named Francis) and Father Zuhlsdorf (How I received our new Pope.) shows an image of a holy man who obviously has a mandate to clean up the Vatican, the Roman Curia and diocesan bishops whose clerical obfuscation discredits the Church. It is for Roman Catholicism as if someone like Archbishop Greg Venables of the Southern Cone were made Archbishop of Canterbury.

Roman Catholicism of the future is clearly Latino and African. Those peoples form the majority of humanity and that’s where Christianity in a loud, exuberant and Evangelical form are booming. Roman Catholicism competes with Evangelical and Charismatic missions with a similar product – albeit with a different theological content.

I don’t think Pope Francis will actually do anything against the Ordinariates, the Fraternity of St Peter or anyone else. These groups are likely to be left to the tender mercies of episcopal conferences and perhaps a “benign neglect” as some call it. Anglican converts and Latin Mass traditionalists simply don’t matter compared with the millions of Latinos and their social concerns.

What this seems to mean is that those who went over to Rome under the Benedict XVI pontificate and those of us who remain in our independent communities are on our own in human terms. We have to manage without asking for legitimacy from anyone else.

One thing is clear. This is not the nineteenth century. The Pope is not Pius IX and there are no comparisons possible between the conversion of Newman and the stark reality of our modernity and the stakes of the world in which we live. Triumphalism is over.

I believe that Christ, in our messed-up world and churches, will be calling us – from wherever we are – to be with him because we are not against him. Even if I and many others have not the slightest inclination to become members of the Roman Catholic institution, we will be hearing many fundamental truths. I have done Ignatian retreats, and the two things that most stand out are the fundamental choice we make between God and Satan and the discernment of spirits. Saint Ignatius had incredible insight into the human soul. I quote from Magister about the supreme priority:

“The real problem at this moment of our history,” pope Ratzinger wrote in a memorable letter to the bishops, “is that God is disappearing from the human horizon, and, with the dimming of the light which comes from God, humanity is losing its bearings, with increasingly evident destructive effects. Leading men and women to God, to the God who speaks in the Bible: this is the supreme and fundamental priority of the Church and of the Successor of Peter at the present time.”

Everything else that the cardinals discussed before the conclave, the mismanagement of the curia and of Vatican finances, the long onslaught of sexual scandals, the internecine wars among churchmen, is nothing other than the dark side of this which is the Church’s reason for being: “to show men and women the way to God.”

It is the “filth” which must be swept away decisively, if one wishes the Church to be able to dedicate itself completely, without shadows obscuring it, to its sole and true mission: to revive the Christian faith where it is almost extinguished and to propagate it where it has not yet arrived.

We put to sea in our little boats, setting our courses for the same destination. We can only pray for fair winds and God’s grace.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Morning After Round-up

  1. Stephen K says:

    Father, I can detect a real sense of let-down in your comment that “anyone who has an interest in liturgy, Anglican or pre-Pauline Roman, is at the bottom of the list of priorities”. I don’t think this is the only or the most accurate way of looking at things. I understand how liturgy is so central to religion: it is the water from the well, so to speak. We die of thirst without water. We need it. But I think it’s wrong to see it as the most important thing. It’s not a goal but a restorative. What we exist for, what we live for, what we must be focused on, is love, in all its myriad Christian ways: forebearance, generosity, patience, courtesy, respect, sharing one’s food and clothing with the needy, sharing one’s talents with the needy, asking nothing in return.

    Why do we shrink from such a radical way of living? No doubt partly because we lack the prudential wisdom to know how to do so for greatest benefit. But partly because we are afraid to let go and be spontaneous in joy and confidence in God.

    The liturgy is important in context, and aesthetics plays a large part in thinking and feeling the language of the spirit; but we must always guard against “fiddling while Rome burns”. A gilt chalice is a token to the reverence and quality we should express towards God, from one angle, but a glittering reproach while a single child starves – from another.

    Let liturgy be your apostolate perhaps and do not feel disappointed that the higher-ups leave it to you. That they concern themselves with integrity and humility and service rather than obsess over power and obedience in the manner of earthly princes, is or must be considered a blessing, not before time!

    Be of positive spirit: in the Father’s house there are many mansions.

    • These are pearls of wisdom, as something new and unknown comes over us all, whether we are Roman Catholics or members of other communities. I have had the joy of celebrating Mass on a rock by the sea in the greatest simplicity. Yes, I think it is down to us to see about the liturgy, because we can no longer look to those who are higher up to pander to what they see as non-essential. It would be like asking the Queen of England for directions from Victoria Station to Green Park – it suffices to look at a map or ask any ordinary person who knows!

      We all have examinations of conscience to make.

      We should also beware of cujus rex ejus religio – the Vicar of Bray syndrome. Triumphalist rhetoric is going to change now that Benedict XVI is no longer Pope, and many are going to want to justify the Mahony’s and the Küngs, or tell us that obedience to anti-traditional authority is tradition. One might as well tell me that everything I say is a lie and make me short-circuit my processors!

      I think the challenge will be for us to become authentic Christians and continue doing what we are doing without flinching.

  2. Andrew says:

    My instinct, non-rational as it is, is that you are right here.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s